Sign in Check my fit
EN

Cooperative Agreement for affiliated Partner with Great Rivers Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit

Open now · Cooperative Agreement · G27AS00059

Next cut-off
07 Dec '26
in 31 days
Per grant
$300K
the call's own average
Grants expected
1
projects that will be funded
Funding rate
,
not published, read the conditions

In context of US Department of the Interior

This grant$300K
The track runs to the largest grant in US Department of the Interior ($12M). The median across the 64 calls we publish is $346K, this one is below it.

What this call funds

The USGS is offering a funding opportunity to a Great Rivers CESU partner for research to assess the efficacy of using in-situ fluorometry for detection of milt (seminal fluid) from invasive carp in rivers downstream from spawning sites. Invasive carp–bighead (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) silver (H. molitrix), grass(Ctenopharyngodon idella), and black (Mylopharyngodon piceus) carp–are native to Southeast Asia and have spread throughout much of the Mississippi River Basin since their escape from private, wastewater, and aquaculture ponds in the 1980s. Technologies allowing for early detection of these species, especially evidence of natural reproduction, are needed by state and federal agencies throughout the Great Lakes and Mississippi River Basins to control the spread of invasive carp and assess risk to uninvaded waters. Natural resource managers have generally relied upon labor-intensive ichthyoplankton sampling by boat crews to determine if invasive carp are spawning in a river. While these samples can provide direct evidence of spawning, they require crews to be on the water sampling in the right place and right time during a spawning event. The discrete samples collected using traditional sampling methods are generally spatiotemporally sparse due to limited resources. Recent deployments of streamside environmental DNA (eDNA) autosamplers have shown promise in detection of spawning activity (project webpage). However, the equipment and analyses are costly, the system has limited sampling capability, results are not available in real-time, and eDNA methods used cannot currently discern the presence of milt or eggs from that of adult fish.

What applying costs you

ItemEstimateNote
Drafting effort3–4 weekssingle submission
Time to first payment6–9 monthscut-off → evaluation → grant agreement

These are Bemzu's estimates from the call's structure (the number of stages and whether a consortium is required) not figures published by the Commission. Only the co-financing share is read from the call itself.

Also open in DOI

Become the beneficiary.

Eight questions, no account, nothing sent anywhere. You will know which of the 1499 open calls you can actually enter before you finish your coffee.

Check my fit